exsilium | video;

Skip to Main Content

Entry tags:

video;

[ The video starts black. Light cuts through in sharp lines, edging in around blades of grass. No, make that fur.

Fur that gains color into browns as it shifts away from blocking the camera's eye. The rabbit hops away down the table, disappearing for a minute. Two. When it comes back in view, it appears to be wearing tiny, lens-free glasses perched precariously on its twitching nose.

The rabbit sits back on its hind legs, ears swiveling forward and paws tucking close to its chest. When it glances toward the camera, it's almost like the rabbit winks. But it couldn't have.

Could it? ]

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

[ Okay, sure. Cute little subordinate. ]

I don't have a pet, Miles.

[ ~~Not after Papa considered my puppy.~~ ]

[ NO ]

I know that, but I was suggesting that you perhaps try using your imagination.

Alright. My pet shall be cute and too useful to eat. [ ~~spoilers it's u little brother~~ ]

[ ~~rude~~ ]

Yet if someone were to feel differently?

[ but you're cute and useful (shakingcryingplurkemote) ]

That fool shall taste the sting of my whip until he stops feeling anything at all.

[ Exactly, Franziska, exactly. ]

Thus, my point is proven.

[ Although with slightly more violence than necessary. ]

[ Slightly more is not enough. She must be perfect. ~~WHIPPING CARNAAAAAAGE~~ ]

You weren't able to prove anything, Miles.

Oh, but I did. Were you incapable of following my logic, Franziska? If so, I can explain it to you.

Explain a make-believe point made from a make-believe situation? That changes nothing.

Doesn't it? It proves that your thinking was too limited. [ Yeah he went there. ]

[ oh no he didn't ]

It proves that you can't prove anything without going through imaginary tangents!

Tangent? It was a hypothetical. You may very well have a pet one day; it's relevant.

Unlikely. I already have my hands full with you, and you have yet to start scratching or chewing on the furniture.

Excuse me? I'm not your pet.

Don't be greedy. You're already my little brother.

[ oh for goodness's sake. fine, he'll let that pet comment slide. ]

'Big' brother.

'Littler' brother, since you're younger than you're supposed to be.

Are we really going to have this conversation again?

For as long as you keep forgetting your place, yes.

Then in that case: I haven't forgotten; you are simply mistaken.

I was in the family first. There's no mistaking that.

... Is that what all this is about?

It's not. Nevertheless, you are still the littler one.

On the contrary, I believe I'm at least half a foot taller than you are.

Which has nothing to do with this discussion!

video;

bratworth - 2012-12-18 04:17 (UTC) - Expand

video;

perfectionisms - 2012-12-21 16:03 (UTC) - Expand

video; FREUDIAN SLIP....

bratworth - 2012-12-22 09:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

perfectionisms - 2012-12-24 10:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

bratworth - 2012-12-26 00:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

perfectionisms - 2012-12-30 08:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

bratworth - 2013-01-04 11:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

perfectionisms - 2013-01-05 17:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

bratworth - 2013-01-06 10:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

perfectionisms - 2013-01-07 16:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

bratworth - 2013-01-08 07:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

perfectionisms - 2013-01-12 08:39 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

bratworth - 2013-01-14 17:21 (UTC) - Expand

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only