tergiversant: (Try again darling)
Rufus Barma ([personal profile] tergiversant) wrote in [community profile] exsilium2013-12-29 02:02 pm

Video

[The video feed this morning has multiple purposes. Initially it was a simple test, to see if the illusion he'd cast broadcast to the network. It failed, instead, showing a young looking man sitting in the Observation Deck on the moon, face half obscured by his fan. But mostly, this is for information. His tone is arrogant and movements slow and measured.]

I wish to pose two queries to thee.

Firstly, I wish to know what of the enemy thou hast unearthed below. I hath read accounts of war and organization, accounts of those of less human appearance treated within the tenants of fear. Leaving aside such debates upon the validity and consequence of tampering with what hath passed in the mires of one's regret and defeat, tis a great number of conversations upon the future and past, but a dearth of those of the present. I assume such, that thine situation remains bleak, and that the project vile and untoward may have continued... But little of the new face of our enemy.

This world, which hath changed so wild and bitterly from the squalor and civilization it had boasted... do we still have a capable enemy who still strikes at our worlds afar? What sayeth the people below?

Tis true, to attack boldly is suicide. Tis true, spying without knowledge as a guard is suicide. However tis true, to jab wildly at the past at an enemy we dost not understand ... tis foolishness and absurdity. Tis possible we may not have a war that concerns us.

Corrections of this, these assumptions, art most welcome.

[He pauses, folding his fan to tap it at his chin.]

Secondly, tis thus: I desire to speak with one most practiced in the art or pedagogy of science. I hath researched soundly the foundational elements and request to employ an expert in 'chemistry' and 'genetics.'


(OOC NOTE: Rufus Barma is a ridiculous creature who speaks in deliberately archaic mannerisms! BUT, if OOCLY you'd like a plain English version, just mention it in the subject line!)
totallytrustworthy: (cb2)

[personal profile] totallytrustworthy 2014-01-02 03:03 am (UTC)(link)
So you never had the chance to see Exsilium as it was. [There's no maliciousness or snobbery involved. It's a simple question while she tries to get an idea of who he is and why he might maintain the stance that he does. ]

Edited (Phone tags pls ) 2014-01-02 03:04 (UTC)
totallytrustworthy: (MP smurk smurk SMURKITY SMURK)

[personal profile] totallytrustworthy 2014-01-04 07:08 am (UTC)(link)
No. A bloody nightmare might summarize it accurately, though newfound freedom without some sort of structure might prove to be equally as horrid.
totallytrustworthy: (whatever it was)

[personal profile] totallytrustworthy 2014-01-05 01:26 am (UTC)(link)
Erasing both entirely would mean erasing lives-- you do know that, right?

totallytrustworthy: (Default)

[personal profile] totallytrustworthy 2014-01-05 02:09 am (UTC)(link)
We're all pawns, mate. Just because the transporter doesn't outright affect us doesn't mean we've got a right to go bushing off the shit decisions that we go about making.

[Still, she can't deny the knowledge that eventually they're going to need to unravel just about every last original strand this world has to offer. And if their Initiative staff last long enough to see that through-- if they actually make it that far without being erased-- they can't be left alone with that sort of power. It'd drive the poor bastards mad in a heartbeat.]
totallytrustworthy: (I'm waiting for my moment to come)

[personal profile] totallytrustworthy 2014-01-07 04:33 am (UTC)(link)
Good. [Call it her first priority, making sure they're on the same page in that respect. ]

So as for the rest of it, there are no guarantees. We don't know what the United Earth is up to, but assuming they're less than what they once were-- well, it'd be a sure fire way to get ourselves wiped off the map faster than we can blink.