biwinning: (I honorably pass that torch.)
Sollux Captor ([personal profile] biwinning) wrote in [community profile] exsilium2013-04-22 04:53 pm

10 - [Video]

[So Sollux thought it'd be a good idea to see what Earth movies are like. And with Crank as his only basis thus far, he's 1. not impressed, and 2. confused on a few things.]

Hey.

That movie that was shown last night, used a lot of words I don't know. Human vernacular ith really stupid and weird. Tho everyone should tell me all the thwear words they know and what they mean. There were like twenty onesth I didn't know in that movie, and I thtill don't get what they meant. Thith ith for educational purposes, of course.
heartsink: (six)

[personal profile] heartsink 2013-05-22 01:56 am (UTC)(link)
Hah. Fair enough.
heartsink: (quatorze)

[personal profile] heartsink 2013-05-22 02:36 am (UTC)(link)
Really.

It's sort of a, caught between Scylla and Charybdis situation. On the one hand, a giant monster that will kill and eat you, and probably most everyone else stuck in the same boat as you. On the other, an inescapable whirlpool that will sink your ship and kill everyone on board.

Choosing one over another isn't a case of "safe" and "unsafe." Rather, it's "unsafe" and "a different kind of unsafe." Just because you would trust one person in a situation before another, that doesn't mean you truly trust either of them.

But then, I'm surly, uncooperative, and paranoid, and I would sooner throw myself overboard than choose either.
heartsink: (cinq)

[personal profile] heartsink 2013-05-22 03:17 am (UTC)(link)
You know, people keep telling me that it's random, who the Initiative manages to bring here.

But it seems so improbable in light of something like that.
heartsink: (sept)

[personal profile] heartsink 2013-05-22 03:24 am (UTC)(link)
Nobody is completely useless. You can make anyone useful with enough effort.

But the potential for loyalty, for a cause like this, in a situation like this? I'd say that's a much rarer quality.
heartsink: (onze)

[personal profile] heartsink 2013-05-22 03:43 am (UTC)(link)
Military skill is covered by the mandatory training sessions; having fewer people with a previous military background reduces the risk of a successful strategic coup, and lowers the chance of having soldiers with a more firmly entrenched loyalty elsewhere.

Physical strength can be trained; mental strength ends up with people asking more questions. From what I can gather, everyone is given "abilities" through their Weapons.

It's easier to turn a canvas into the picture you want if it's blank of anything that would hinder you. Why do you think so many of the people brought here are adolescents?
heartsink: (sept)

[personal profile] heartsink 2013-05-22 04:03 am (UTC)(link)
[ (´///) well, she DID confess to being paranoid... ]

Maybe not.

But then again, setting a group against one of its own for being an outlier can inspire greater loyalty too, can't it?

Maybe it's only the impression I've gotten, but don't most Transports look down on the people who are actively against the Initiative? If that's true, why?
heartsink: (quatre)

heck yeah private city

[personal profile] heartsink 2013-05-22 04:43 am (UTC)(link)
[ This did not go in the direction she was expecting. Go on about how trust is a sucker's game → receive confessions about getting people killed?? So it takes a little bit longer for this response to send. ]

With it like this, there's no shame in preferring the better circumstances. At least, I don't feel so. I may wake up resenting being here, every single day, but I know what the opposite is like, too. Feeling lucky to have what you do.

That's part of why I can't believe this is random. There's so many people here that would return only to a grave in their original world. This is their second chance—their only chance to continue on. Maybe it's a genuine mercy, maybe it's only strategy. I couldn't tell you.

As for what you did, I only have your word to go on; I wasn't here for any of that. And though I can hypothesize reasons, why you weren't punished, or weren't in a way you could see, they'd only be theories. Even for me, that might be too callous.


[ Spoilers, even with the jaded uncaring exterior, she is still a gooey-hearted empath when it counts. ]
heartsink: (un)

priva-city

[personal profile] heartsink 2013-05-22 05:01 am (UTC)(link)
I don't mind the heaviness of it, so you don't have to apologize. Catching feelings is familiar ground for me. I'll never breathe a word of it to anyone.

You're free to change the subject if you like, or not.
heartsink: (sept)

priva-city

[personal profile] heartsink 2013-05-22 05:08 am (UTC)(link)
[ ruka think fast
what's a good topic to distract someone from angst
]

Hm...

You used a term I'm not familiar with, earlier. Your primary loyalty is to your "quadrants" ?
heartsink: (onze)

priva-city

[personal profile] heartsink 2013-05-22 05:31 am (UTC)(link)
[ This is
so much more to the point than movie-night ramblings that last for three freaking hours
or PSAs with diagrams and annotations and community examples
she doesn't even need painkillers for this.
]

Yes, human.

The spectrum's a little wider than I'm used to, but these four relationships (Or is it five? Since ♣ involves two others?) constitute the people most important to you, yes?

Which two are the "required" ones?


heartsink: (deux)

priva-city

[personal profile] heartsink 2013-05-22 06:47 am (UTC)(link)
[ The Karkat Explanation, multiple times during Troll Romcoms, and the Eridan Ampora Power Point Presentations of "this is an excuse to take potshots at people I don't like," with special guest appearances by people who type in purples.
her life.
]

Oh, that makes sense. The theory of ♣ makes sense to me, a little. Though, when humans need someone to mediate like that, we wouldn't consider that a formal relationship.

Well, unless that mediator was a therapist, I suppose, but that's a little more complicated.

(Personally, I would get a restraining order.)
heartsink: (cinq)

priva-city

[personal profile] heartsink 2013-05-22 07:03 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, it's legal thing.

Say, for example, that we're in conflict, and I'm harassing you. Or stalking you, or threatening to hurt you. Something like that. In the sort of justice system I'm familiar with, you could go to court and get a restraining order filed against me.

This would set certain restrictions on me, regarding my behavior towards you. I wouldn't be allowed to contact you, or visit places where you live or work, or even *be* within a certain radial distance of you. Et cetera.

If I broke any of those conditions, I could be arrested.

After all, you don't really need a mediator between two people if they're never in contact with one another.

priva-city

[personal profile] heartsink - 2013-05-22 07:29 (UTC) - Expand

priva-city

[personal profile] heartsink - 2013-05-22 07:56 (UTC) - Expand

priva-city

[personal profile] heartsink - 2013-05-22 08:23 (UTC) - Expand

priva-city

[personal profile] heartsink - 2013-05-22 08:29 (UTC) - Expand

priva-city i saw nothing

[personal profile] heartsink - 2013-05-22 09:34 (UTC) - Expand

priva-city

[personal profile] heartsink - 2013-05-23 05:35 (UTC) - Expand

priva-city

[personal profile] heartsink - 2013-05-23 08:09 (UTC) - Expand

priva-city

[personal profile] heartsink - 2013-05-29 21:55 (UTC) - Expand

priva-city

[personal profile] heartsink - 2013-05-29 22:53 (UTC) - Expand

priva-city

[personal profile] heartsink - 2013-05-29 23:15 (UTC) - Expand

priva-city

[personal profile] heartsink - 2013-05-29 23:29 (UTC) - Expand

priva-city

[personal profile] heartsink - 2013-05-30 00:28 (UTC) - Expand

priva-city

[personal profile] heartsink - 2013-05-30 10:36 (UTC) - Expand

priva-city

[personal profile] heartsink - 2013-06-02 03:39 (UTC) - Expand

priva-city

[personal profile] heartsink - 2013-06-02 05:06 (UTC) - Expand

priva-city

[personal profile] heartsink - 2013-06-02 05:29 (UTC) - Expand

priva-city

[personal profile] heartsink - 2013-06-02 10:42 (UTC) - Expand

priva-city

[personal profile] heartsink - 2013-06-02 17:44 (UTC) - Expand

there's one!!

[personal profile] heartsink - 2013-06-03 05:37 (UTC) - Expand