dualreaping: (pic#5632115)
Death ([personal profile] dualreaping) wrote in [community profile] exsilium2013-02-01 04:31 pm

video

[So he's figured out how this tablet works now, so started reading back a bit. One thing has mostly caught his attention, so here he is.]

A lot of you seem adamant to abstain from offering your loyalty to the initiative, which...I understand in the sense that they are strangers just as much as the United Earth.

But should the claims of their forces attempting to raid your own home world be true, it would have disastrous consequences for the people you know still there. Is that worth the risk?

Or is there something else I'm missing here?

[C'mon people, he suspects he's missed something important. Give him some deets.]
skennen: ([→] hood .)

voice;

[personal profile] skennen 2013-02-01 10:28 pm (UTC)(link)
[Ah, a subject right up his little alley. Also, nice mask there, stranger. ... He hopes that's a mask, anyway.]

They are more than strangers - they are slavers. They have used their machine to steal people from their homes and their times, and then they insist those people, their prisoners, fight for them. What choice are we given?

As for their claims... I would not think it below them to craft lies in hopes of inspiring fear and obedience. Even if what they say is true, would it not be better then to leave us to our homes, that we may defend them?
skennen: ([→] severe .)

voice;

[personal profile] skennen 2013-02-02 10:15 am (UTC)(link)
So they say, but as with their other claims, it is difficult to believe. I have heard they have little control over the machine they use to bring people here. They do not even know who they are enslaving. How then do they presume to change history in such a way that the end result is exactly what they envision? Who is to say their meddling will not strengthen their enemies or give rise to others? Who is to say it will not have serious consequences, either for this place or for our lands? How do they know what precisely they should do to alter the past favorably, and how can they expect us to see out their plans when they assemble us at random?

... Even if they have some means of ensuring their victory, and against all odds no harm will come of it, that does not justify how they are building their army.

[There his tirade comes to a grudging end. For all that he is against the Initiative, he doesn't consider himself against those who would help them. That is their choice. But after the events of the past two weeks, he finds so much more fault in what their captors do. Griping and grumbling up a storm.]

I have only been witness to the last two missions so I cannot say for certain if they do or not. It seemed as though everyone was made to attend the missions, but I did not see the Initiative force participation in the tasks given to us. Still, many people were put at risk simply in being transported to mission locations.
skennen: ([↓] regret .)

voice;

[personal profile] skennen 2013-02-03 09:09 am (UTC)(link)
Not all people are content to wait.

[A relatively light statement in comparison to his aggressive ranting a moment ago. He sighs.]

And the Initiative are not without means of controlling us.
skennen: ([←] truth .)

voice;

[personal profile] skennen 2013-02-05 03:03 am (UTC)(link)
[He would have had serious doubts about that claim in the days following his arrival, but after seeing firsthand all the unnatural abilities other Transports have... Well, maybe it's not such an farfetched idea that the Initiative wouldn't be able to control everyone.]

I should hope to meet those people.

[Earnestly said. From a strictly-Assassin perspective, he finds he rather likes that beyond control line, too.]

They possess a sleeping poison.

[One of these days he'll learn the term 'sedative'. Really.]
skennen: ([?] stopped .)

[personal profile] skennen 2013-02-07 06:15 am (UTC)(link)
No. I meant only that they are able to stop attacks against them.

I have not heard of the Initiative controlling anyone directly. At least, not yet I haven't.

[That's an especially troubling thought for him.]
skennen: ([←] retreat .)

[personal profile] skennen 2013-02-10 08:07 am (UTC)(link)
[It takes him a moment to reply and when he does, his voice hisses out between his teeth.]

... Of course. Of course they did.
skennen: ([←] rooftops .)

[personal profile] skennen 2013-02-11 03:56 am (UTC)(link)
Not a personal experience, no. But there are... stories, where I am from. About that kind of thing.
skennen: ([→] acknowledge .)

[personal profile] skennen 2013-02-12 07:39 pm (UTC)(link)
I would not be surprised if they turned to that idea again in the future. For all we know, the man they claim was responsible for the act may have only been the scapegoat of a failed attempt at taking direct control of us.

We shall see what the future brings, but I do not advise you forget their history.
skennen: ([?] suspicious .)

[personal profile] skennen 2013-02-14 02:52 am (UTC)(link)
How is that?
skennen: ([?] perplexed .)

[personal profile] skennen 2013-02-18 05:59 am (UTC)(link)
Death.

[Last he checked death was a part of life. An inevitable and often unfortunate (though sometimes very necessary) part of life.

Not a person.]


Explain.
skennen: ([?] misgiving .)

[personal profile] skennen 2013-02-23 08:40 am (UTC)(link)
[Reap the souls of...]

... You touched in the head?
skennen: ([→] detest .)

[personal profile] skennen 2013-02-25 04:53 am (UTC)(link)
No, I suppose it doesn't.

But so you know: a man's soul does not require reaping.
skennen: ([→] impatience .)

[personal profile] skennen 2013-02-27 02:55 am (UTC)(link)
It is what I know. After a man has passed, his soul departs from this world and journeys beyond on its own.

(no subject)

[personal profile] skennen - 2013-02-27 03:34 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] skennen - 2013-03-06 10:45 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] skennen - 2013-03-07 11:22 (UTC) - Expand